asistencia básica. En Chaiklin, S y Lave, J. (Eds.).
Estudiar las prácticas.
Perspectivas sobre actividad y contexto
. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, pp. 78 – 118.
Engestrom, Y. (2006). La teoria dell’ attività e il cambiamento organizzativo. En
Zucchermaglio C., y Alby F. (Eds.).
Psicologia culturale delle organizzazioni
.
Roma: Carocci, pp. 221 – 255.
Engeström, Y., y Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations,
findings and future challenges.
Educational Research Review,
No. 5, pp. 1-24.
Engeström, Y., y Sannino, A. (2013). La volition et l’agentivitétransformatrice:
perspectivethéorique de l’activité.
Revueinternationale du CRIRES: innoverdans la
tradition de Vygotsky .
Vol 1, no 1, pp. 4-19.
Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., y Poikela, R. (1996). Change
laboratory as a tool for transforming work.
Lifelong Learning in Europe,
1(2), pp.
10-17.
Gergen, K. y Thatchenkery, T. (2006). Organizational science and the promises of
postmodernism. En Hosking, D. M. y McNamee, S. (eds).
The social construction
of organization
. Ljubljana: Liber y Copenhagen Business School Press, pp. 34-51.
Gherardi, S., y Nicolini, D. (2004).
Apprendimento e conoscenza nelle
organizzazioni
. Roma: Carocci, pp.127.
Holzman, L. (2006). Lev Vygotsky and the new performative psychology: some
implications for business and organizations. En Hosking, D. M. y McNamee, S.
(eds).
The social construction of organization
. Ljubljana: Liber y Copenhagen
Business School Press, pp. 254-268.