Página 492 - INTERVENCION Y CAMBIO ORGANIZACIONAL

Versión de HTML Básico

Lave, J., y Wenger, E. (2003).
Aprendizaje situado: participación periférica
legítima
, México: UNAM, pp. 105.
Leontiev, A. N. (1984).
Actividad, conciencia y personalidad
. México: Cartago, pp.
239.
Ligorio, B., y Pontecorvo, C. (Eds.). (2010).
La scuola come contesto. Prospettive
psicologico-culturali
. Roma: Carocci, pp. 301.
Mantovani, G. (Ed.), (2000).
Ergonomia. Lavoro, sicurezza e nuove tecnologie
.
Bolonia: Ilmulino, pp. 283.
Montoro, C., y Hampel, R. (2011). Investigating language learning activity using a
CALL task in the self-access center.
Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal
, No.
2, (3) pp. 119-135.
Montoro, C., y Hampel, R. (2012). “CALL: A triangle of triangles”.
The EUROCALL
Review. Proceedings of the EUROCALL 2011 Conference,
Vol. 20, pp. 121-123.
Rossi, F. (2011). Quandol’eterogeneita’ in classe diventa un problema:
un’esperienza di ricerca-azione con gli insegnanti. En Ajello A. y V. Ghione (Eds.).
Comunicazione e apprendimento tra scuola e societá. Scritti in onore di Clotilde
Pontecorvo.
Roma: Edizioni Infantiae.Org, pp. 219-224.
Sannino, A. (2008). From talk to action: experiencing interlocution in
developmental interventions.
Mind, Culture, and Activity
, No. 15 (3), pp. 234-257.
Sannino, A. (2010). Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and
agency.
Teaching and Teacher Education
, No. 26, pp. 838-844.
Sannino, A. (2011). Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory.
Theory y
Psychology,
No. 21(5), pp. 571–597.